1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar


Want to add this gigapan to your favorites? Log In or Sign Up now.

Log In now to add this Gigapan to a group gallery.

About This Gigapan

Toggle
Taken by
The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661" The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661"
Explore score
115
Size
1.63 Gigapixels
Views
2271
Date added
May 25, 2010
Date taken
May 25, 2010
Categories
 
Galleries
Competitions
Tags
Description

Another image in the "Two Gigapanographers in a Land Cruiser" series. This one is taken by Man Garnier (www.gigapan.org/profiles/27192/) with back-seat driving by Kilgore661.

This image is taken from the same location as Zoom Baby, Zoom (www.gigapan.org/gigapans/9802/ ) but looking the other way.

192 images, 7D, 70-200mm at 200mm, a bit of cut-and-paste tonemapping.


Gigapan Comments (8)

Toggle Minimize gigapan_comment
  1. The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661"

    The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661" (May 31, 2010, 12:06AM )

    I think you could be right. I only just realised that Englishcombe is in both gigapans and you can directly compare snapshots of the church: www.gigapan.org/gigapans/50420/snap shots/142779/ and www.gigapan.org/gigapans/9802/snaps hots/143857/As an aside It looks like I used different projections because the church looks shorter and fatter in one of the images.

  2. David Engle

    David Engle (May 30, 2010, 10:41PM )

    The combination of the 7D and a 200mm focal length would make the next version of Zoom Baby, Zoom much more detailed than the first one.

  3. The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661"

    The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661" (May 30, 2010, 08:19PM )

    That would be an interesting experiment because it's not clear to me that the combination of a 7D and a 200mm lens would make a bigger picture. This is because I've lost the original photos for Zoom Baby, Zoom so I don't know what zoom I used on the H7. What would be even more interesting would be if I could borrow the 600mm prime (www.gigapan.org/gigapans/50232/snap shots/142258/ ) and use that :-)

  4. David Engle

    David Engle (May 30, 2010, 02:46PM )

    Imagine for a moment, Zoom Baby, Zoom being seen only as a single paper print and being handled over 21,200 (5-30-2010) ... it would be a bit torn about the edges ... what I am saying is, since you know the hill so well and can probably locate the exact spot where you placed the tripod to take Zoom Baby, Zoom ... why not take a second version with the 7D and call the result, "For Old Times Sake?" ... or something similar.

  5. The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661"

    The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661" (May 30, 2010, 12:21PM )

    Sadly the view from the top of the hill is not a full 360ยบ because of trees and hedges. If somone would care to hire a cherry-picker for me then we should talk!

  6. David Engle

    David Engle (May 29, 2010, 03:11PM )

    Since this was taken at the same location as Zoom Baby, Zoom, my simple question: is there a clear 360 degree horizon, or close to it so that we may see this GigaPan blended in with a new version of Zoom Baby, Zoom taken with the 7D and at 200mm?

  7. The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661"

    The Gigapanographer Currently Known as "Kilgore661" (May 26, 2010, 12:21AM )

    No, the guys that do it are already in action just down the road - see tinyurl.com/2dvf7kg Will open in
a new tab or window . You really have to hand it to them for providing us with such great entertainment eg www.gigapan.org/gigapans/21467/

  8. Richard Palmer

    Richard Palmer (May 25, 2010, 10:25PM )

    I guess it'll be a couple of months before the "crop circles" begin to appear. ;^)

The GigaPan EPIC Series, Purchase an GigaPan EPIC model and receive GigaPan Stitch complimentary

Where in the World is this GigaPan?

Toggle

Member Log In