fetching snapshots...Log In now to add this GigaPan to a group gallery.
Log In now to add this GigaPan to a gallery.
About This GigaPan
Toggle- Taken by
-
eesnyder
- Explore score
- 29
- Size
- 0.38 Gigapixels
- Views
- 61
- Date added
- February 15, 2013
- Date taken
- February 14, 2013
- Categories
- Galleries
- Competitions
- Tags
- Description
-
This pano was done at much higher resolution. It shows how more frames doesn't necessarily equate to better performance. I assume that the similarity of the individual frames made it difficult to assemble the image-- however, one would think that providing "grid" information prior to assembly would eliminate this problem. Indeed, Stitch requires this information while other pano program (autostitch, autopano, etc) do not. Since there are very few parameters to change in Stitch, what can be done to force this pano together? Suggestions?
Stitcher Notes
ToggleMinimizeGigaPan Stitch.Efx version 2.1.0161 (Windows)
Panorama size: 380 megapixels (32772 x 11608 pixels)
Input images: 210 (21 columns by 10 rows)
Field of view: 55.8 degrees wide by 19.8 degrees high (top=-9.4, bottom=-29.1)
Settings:
Vignette correction off
Build panorama at 50% scale (loses detail)
Original image properties:
Camera make: NIKON CORPORATION
Camera model: NIKON D7000
Image size: 4928x3264 (16.1 megapixels)
Capture time: 2013-02-14 14:01:00 - 2013-02-14 14:21:35
Aperture: f/32
Exposure time: 0.0025
ISO: 400
Focal length (35mm equiv.): 315.0 mm
Digital zoom: off
White balance: Fixed
Exposure mode: Manual
Horizontal overlap: 2.0 to 94.3 percent
Vertical overlap: 17.2 to 97.2 percent
Computer stats: 16344.3 MB RAM, 6 CPUs
Total time 1:02:56 (18 seconds per picture)
Alignment: 21:33, Projection: 5:40, Blending: 35:43
(Preview finished in 53:05)
GigaPan Comments ()
Toggle Minimize gigapan_comment